- Messages
- 916
Probably the majority of people who sign up for dumb "cardholder protection" plans and the like are females. A sales guy will tell them, "For just x extra dollars a month, you can get cardholder protection, which will keep you safe in case of blah blah blah, I recommend it because blah blah blah" and if the guy sounds sincere and confident in what he's saying, they'll go along with it.
They're not really good at thinking about stuff logically and dispassionately. If they somehow manage to avoid scams, it's probably because they've been trained to say, "My [husband/dad/other male authority figure] handles the money" or they've been given specific instructions about what to buy or not buy, and they follow those.
Left to their own devices, they just fall for one scam after another. And they buy a lot of dumb stuff on a whim, like clothes that they'll never wear. It's just in women's nature to love shopping, and with all these catalogs and stuff, the shopping never ends, even when they're at home.
Once the constraints imposed by the man's being in charge of the finances are taken away, they just end up wasting a lot of money. And one of the implications of this is that quite a lot of the money in the economy ends up going to bullshit.
What's the end result, though, of buying useless stuff like cardholder protection? I mean, it's just a paper transaction, really. It seems like it probably funnels more money into the big banks and other corporations that sell that kind of stuff. So, probably the net effect of women having more economic power is that more money goes to the wealthy elites and to various kinds of shysters who prey on them.
What would it be like if men had more of the money? Probably we'd spend it on increasing the population, as opposed to letting the white race die out.
Idk, once we start talking about economics, stuff gets pretty complicated. But, if money is going to sales guys, in commissions and whatnot, that probably tends to favor a "wolf of Wall Street" crowd, whether on that same level or on a more junior level. Basically Chads and Chadlites with outgoing, persuasive personalities. The money isn't really going to nerds, since they're not the ones selling useless BS to women.
They're not really good at thinking about stuff logically and dispassionately. If they somehow manage to avoid scams, it's probably because they've been trained to say, "My [husband/dad/other male authority figure] handles the money" or they've been given specific instructions about what to buy or not buy, and they follow those.
Left to their own devices, they just fall for one scam after another. And they buy a lot of dumb stuff on a whim, like clothes that they'll never wear. It's just in women's nature to love shopping, and with all these catalogs and stuff, the shopping never ends, even when they're at home.
Once the constraints imposed by the man's being in charge of the finances are taken away, they just end up wasting a lot of money. And one of the implications of this is that quite a lot of the money in the economy ends up going to bullshit.
What's the end result, though, of buying useless stuff like cardholder protection? I mean, it's just a paper transaction, really. It seems like it probably funnels more money into the big banks and other corporations that sell that kind of stuff. So, probably the net effect of women having more economic power is that more money goes to the wealthy elites and to various kinds of shysters who prey on them.
What would it be like if men had more of the money? Probably we'd spend it on increasing the population, as opposed to letting the white race die out.
Idk, once we start talking about economics, stuff gets pretty complicated. But, if money is going to sales guys, in commissions and whatnot, that probably tends to favor a "wolf of Wall Street" crowd, whether on that same level or on a more junior level. Basically Chads and Chadlites with outgoing, persuasive personalities. The money isn't really going to nerds, since they're not the ones selling useless BS to women.
